Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2232
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Derwin McFadden v. James
as 22-6899
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERWIN MCFADDEN
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT JAMES and SERGEANT WILLIAM A. BRANDON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01699
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cr Fed. Question: Civil Rights (Race Discrimination)
Stephen Reese v. William Newman
as 22-6193
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN W. REESE
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT WILLIAM NEWMAN, Billy, Jail Officer, MR. CAPPS, C/O Jail Officer and MR. JONES, C/O Jail Officer
Defendant:
MEHERRIN RIVER REGIONAL JAIL
BATTLE v. FORDHAM et al
as 1:2021cv00692
Plaintiff:
KENNETH A. BATTLE
Defendant:
MERCEDES T. FORDHAM, JOSHUA C. DENNIS, SERGEANT WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leonard Bullock v. Sergeant Williams
as 21-6460
Defendant / Appellee:
M. VANDERMARK, Operations Officer, OFFICER CHENAULT, Floor Officer, BETH CABEL, Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEONARD LORENZO BULLOCK
David Atkins v. Lieutenant Glaser T
as 20-6442
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID ATKINS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT WILLIAMS, LIEUTENANT GLASER T, Team Commander, R. CLEEK, Officer and others
Defendant:
NURSE SAMBOYZ, Head Nurse, RN and JOSEPH P. BARON, Sheriff
McFadden v. James et al
as 5:2020ct03055
Defendant:
Sergeant William A. Brandon and Sergeant James
Plaintiff:
Derwin McFadden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Meyers v. J. Bentley
as 19-6917
Defendant / Appellee:
FL. OFFICER LEWIS, HENRY PONTON, SERGEANT MEADE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00086
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
