Cases 1 - 10 of 40
King v. USA
as 3:2024cv00019
Petitioner:
Silas Thomas King
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
King v. USA
as 3:2024cv00020
Petitioner:
Silas Thomas King
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Buckle et al v. 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co) et al
as 2:2023cv04920
Plaintiff:
Larry Buckle, Thomas Clawson, Willie Hunley Jr and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co.), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Vonell Davis, Jr. v. Wayne Hill
as 23-6212
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VONELL DAVIS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. WAYNE HILL, MS. MARIA MAXINO-SABUNDAYO, MR. VERNON CROWELL and others
Rollins v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00132
Plaintiff:
Silas Rollins
Defendant:
United States America and United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Jolly et al v. United States of America
as 5:2022cv00317
Plaintiff:
Glanzer Floyd Jolly, Anthony Taylor, Peter Optekar and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Jolly et al v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv00032
Plaintiff:
Glanzer Floyd Jolly, Anthony Taylor, Peter Optekar and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Silas Macias-Pineda v. Merrick Garland
as 22-1411
Petitioner:
SILAS AMADO MACIAS-PINEDA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Moore et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2022cv00023
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Carol Moore, Vernon Moore, Terrence Morlan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Johnson v. Hall et al
as 2:2020cv00092
Defendant:
Trevor Jared Robinson, Mary J. Hall, Mason Randolph Carlson, II and others
Plaintiff:
Ethelbert Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
