Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Oklahoma Firefighters Pension and Retirement System v. Calhoun et al.
as 1:2024cv01200
Defendant:
Michael Fleming, Stayce D. Harris, Brian West and others
Intervenor:
Ohio Public Employees Retirement System and State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio
Interested Party:
State of Rhode Island Office of the General Treasurer on behalf of the Employees' Retirement System of Rhode Island and Local # 817 IBT Pension Fund
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma Firefighters Pension and Retirement System
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
State of Rhode Island Office of The General Treasurer v. The Boeing Company et al
as 1:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
State of Rhode Island Office of The General Treasurer, on Behalf of The Employees' Retirement System of The State of Rhode Island and State of Rhode Island Office of the General Treasurer
Defendant:
The Boeing Company, David L. Calhoun, Dennis A. Muilenburg and others
Desenberg v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv01223
Plaintiff:
Roger Marx Desenberg
Defendant:
United States of America, Commonwealth of Virginia, State of California and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
State of Rhode Island, By and Through Peter F. Neronha, Attorney General v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv03634
Defendant:
EIDP Inc, 3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
City of Camden et al v. 3M Company
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2023cv03147
Plaintiff:
City of Camden, City of Brockton, City of Sioux Falls and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Interested Party:
State of Colorado, State of Hawaii, State of Maine and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1130
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 23-1078
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
United States et al v. Google LLC
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES, State Of Virginia, State of California and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Amer College of Obstetricians v. FDA
as 20-1824
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HONOR MACNAUGHTON, M.D., NEW YORK STATE ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS, on behalf of its members and members' patients, AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS, on behalf of its members and members' patients and others
Defendant / Appellant:
STEPHAN HAHN, M.D., in his official capacity of Commissioner of Food and Drugs, and his employees, agents and successors in office, ALEX AZAR, in his official capacity of Secretary, United States Department of of Health and Human Services, and his employees, agents and successors in office, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, STATE OF MISSOURI and others
Intl Refugee Assistance v. Donald J. Trump
as 17-1351
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT, a project of the Urban Justice Center, Inc., on behalf of itself and its clients, HIAS, INC., on behalf of itself and its clients, MUHAMMED METEAB and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.