Cases 1 - 10 of 89
US v. Jesse Stines, Jr.
as 24-4260
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JESSE BERNALE STINES, JR., a/k/a Shyne
Terry Frederick v. Meagan Ramsey
as 24-6130
Plaintiff:
TERRY ANTOINE FREDERICK
Defendant:
MEAGAN RAMSEY, LT. TOMSON, LT. STINE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00366
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Alphonza Thomas-Bey v. John Stine
as 23-6764
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALPHONZA LEONARD PHILLIP THOMAS, III, a/k/a Alphonza L.P. Thomas-Bey
Respondent / Appellee:
JOHN STINE
US v. Jesse Stines, Jr.
as 23-4444
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JESSE BERNALE STINES, JR., a/k/a Shyne
Johnson v. Stine et al
as 7:2023cv00246
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ternae Johnson, Sr.
Defendant:
Off. Christopher Stine, Sgt. Aaron Hankins, Off. M. Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banner v. Daniels-Moore et al
as 6:2023cv00570
Plaintiff:
Genuine Truth Banner
Defendant:
Mrs Audrey Daniels-Moore, Mr Dennis Patterson, Sr, Joel Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Garcia et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00528
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Garcia, Michael Kellison, Walter Goble and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
THOMAS-BEY v. STINE
as 1:2023cv00035
Petitioner:
ALPHONZA L.P. THOMAS-BEY
Respondent:
JOSH STINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Stine et al
as 7:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ternae Johnson, Sr.
Defendant:
Ofc. Christopher Stine, Ofc. Aaron Hankins, Ofc. M. Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
