Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Harper et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv02837
Defendant:
Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, 3M Company and others
Plaintiff:
Carl J Harper, Leon Guy Patterson, Sr, Wayne Earl Paul and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Jones et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv02839
Defendant:
Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, 3M Company and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Jones, Harold Edward Robertson, Robert Charles Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Cox v. USA
as 5:2021cv00272
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Thomas Andrew Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Taylor v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2020cv01614
Defendant:
Dynax Corporation, Buckeye Fire Equipment Company, Chemours Company, The and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Andrew Taylor, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hayes v. Ononye
as 1:2019cv03321
Defendant:
Chuma Ononye
Plaintiff:
Thomas Andrew Hayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hayes, Jr. v. State Of Maryland
as 1:2019cv03276
Respondent:
State Of Maryland
Petitioner:
Thomas Andrew Hayes, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Calderaro et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv02915
Plaintiff:
Gabrielle Usakowski Calderaro and Thomas Andrew Calderaro
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Windels et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv23675
Plaintiff:
Carrie Lynn Windels and Thomas Andrew Windels
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Thomas A. Mills, Sr.
as 13-7358
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
THOMAS ANDREW MILLS, SR.
Mills v. USA
as 5:2012cv00422
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Thomas Andrew Mills, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
