Cases 1 - 10 of 44
WOODBERRY v. MICHAEL et al
as 1:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
MANDRAIL JAMAR WOODBERRY
Defendant:
JUDGE MICHAEL, JOHN BANDLE, M. ODOM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODBERRY v. MICHAEL et al
as 1:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
MANDRAIL JAMAR WOODBERRY
Defendant:
JUDGE MICHAEL, ADA JOHN BANDLE, M. ODOM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitcheson et al v. Mistylou Investments, LLC et al
as 7:2023cv01587
Plaintiff:
Jessica Hinton, Tiffany Gray, Kimberly Cozzens and others
Defendant:
Mistylou Investments, LLC doing business as Tobie's Gentlemen's Club and Brian Donald Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
ALLEN v. MILLS et al
as 1:2023cv00557
Plaintiff:
JESSICA-HILES ALLEN
Defendant:
JOHN A. MILLS, DERRICK TOBY, MICHELE ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Tompkins et al v. US Radiology Specialists Inc.
as 4:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
Sylvia Tompkins, Kenneth Brennan, Toby Libby and others
Defendant:
US Radiology Specialists Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
McDuffie v. Wade et al
as 5:2022ct03112
Plaintiff:
Toby M. McDuffie, Jr.
Defendant:
Dr. Wade, Nurse Nikki and Captain Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bishop v. Funderburk et al
as 3:2021cv00679
Plaintiff:
Dan Bishop
Defendant:
Amy L Funderburk, Paul Newby, Robin Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ewing v. Toby et al
as 5:2021ct03315
Plaintiff:
Jamuel Ewing
Defendant:
Officer Toby, Officer Patton, Officer Burne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elliott v. Lathan et al
as 5:2021ct03266
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Dianna Elliott
Defendant:
AUSA Toby Lathan and Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
