Cases 1 - 10 of 2,211
MacColl v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00073
Petitioner:
John C. MacColl
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Saleh v. United States of America et al
as 5:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Saleh
Defendant:
The United States of America, Warden K. Heckard, Chaplain Weaver and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ESTES
as 2:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
KATIE ESTES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
Navarro v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00009
Petitioner:
Cesar M. Navarro
Respondent:
United States of America
Reza v. United States of America - FBOP et al
as 3:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Matthew Reza
Respondent:
United States of America - FBOP and Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Barrientos v. Watts et al
as 5:2024cv00100
Petitioner:
Jose Barrientos
Respondent:
Watts and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Reza v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00098
Petitioner:
Matthew Reza
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Moore v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00243
Petitioner:
Calvin Moore
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $1,145.00 in U.S. Currency
as 5:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$1,145.00 in U.S. Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
