Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Purcell v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Timothy Purcell
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Dennis Purcell Jr v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv06857
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Purcell, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
LAMBETH et al v. CITY OF HIGH POINT et al
as 1:2023cv00797
Plaintiff:
CARL T. LAMBETH, AMY LIXL-PURCELL, CHRISTOPHER J. ESCHWEILER and others
Defendant:
CITY OF HIGH POINT, CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HIGH POINT, GUILFORD COUNTY SCHOOLS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Purcell v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01197
Plaintiff:
Nancy Purcell
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Purcell v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00688
Plaintiff:
Phillip Purcell
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
MURPHY et al v. TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv00971
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN MURPHY, AKEYA SIMPKINS, ALAN YOUNG and others
Defendant:
TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC., TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC., TITLEMAX OF GEORGIA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Purcell Construction Inc v. DR Horton Inc
as 0:2022cv00391
Plaintiff:
Purcell Construction Inc
Defendant:
DR Horton Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
