Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 88
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01471
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02978
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00248
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Crouch v. Goddard et al
as 3:2024cv00114
Plaintiff: Zachary C. Crouch
Defendant: Braden Goddard, Zeyun Wu, Ben Impson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Wrongful Termination of Employment
Min Dong Wu v. Merrick Garland
as 23-1695
Petitioner: MIN DONG WU
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Wu v. SSA (Social Security Administration) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01157
Plaintiff: Maggie Wu
Defendant: SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Sysco Machinery Corp v. Cymtek Solutions, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00319
Plaintiff: Sysco Machinery Corp
Defendant: Cymtek Solutions, Inc., Cymmetrik, DCS USA Corporation a North Carolina Corporation doing business as Dorey Converting Systems and others
Watkins v. Erie Insurance et al
as 8:2022cv00893
Plaintiff: Alicia Watkins
Defendant: Erie Insurance and Gang Wu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Wu Rong-Zhen v. Merrick Garland
as 22-1001
Petitioner: WU RONG-ZHEN
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00732
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1255

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?