Cases 1 - 10 of 1,944
Mohan et al v. Brewers Hill Realty, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv02722
Plaintiff:
Helen Mohan and Nicole Moss
Defendant:
Brewers Hill Realty, LLC, JDAVIS Architects, Excelsior Communities LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1715 Class Action Fairness Act of 2005
Woods v. Sam's East Inc.
as 2:2024cv00557
Defendant:
Sam's East Inc. doing business as Sam's Club
Plaintiff:
Tracy Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Harry Woods v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv04878
Defendant:
Buckeye Fire Equipment Company, Amerex Corporation, Chemicals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Harry Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hollin v. Herzog et al
as 1:2024cv01521
Defendant:
Anthony Gonzalez, DXC Technology Company, John Sweeney and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Hollin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Fordham v. Artrip et al
as 7:2024cv00566
Defendant:
J. Dignus, A. Reynolds, R. Cochrane and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lamar Fordham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Atrium Health et al
as 3:2024cv00769
Defendant:
FNU LNU, Gene Woods and Atrium Health
Plaintiff:
Harriett Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Williams v. Ratchford et al
as 3:2024cv00771
Defendant:
City of Charlotte, Jose Torres, Tawan Skeen and others
Plaintiff:
Khairi Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morgan v. Wood
as 1:2024cv01455
Plaintiff:
Barbara Morgan
Defendant:
Iris Hilda Wood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Morgan v. Wood
as 1:2024cv01457
Defendant:
Iris Hilda Wood
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Wood v. NFM Inc.
as 1:2024cv02207
Defendant:
NFM Inc.
Plaintiff:
William Wood
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
