Cases 1 - 10 of 7,282
David Babb v. David Isom
as 24-1456
Plaintiff:
DAVID ANTHONY BABB
Defendant:
DAVID ISOM, General Manager for Safe Harbor, RUDY SOCHA, CEO, Wounded Nature Working Veterans, JOHN J. TECKLENBURG, Retired and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
David James, Jr. v. Roanoke City Sheriff's Office
as 24-6479
Plaintiff:
DAVID RANDALL JAMES, JR.
Defendant:
ROANOKE CITY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Briddell v. City of Shelby, et al
as 1:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Angelita Briddell
Defendant:
City of Shelby and John White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Truist Bank et al v. Secretary of Department of Housing and Urban Development et al
as 3:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Truist Bank and Trustee Services of Virginia, LLC
Defendant:
Secretary of Department of Housing and Urban Development, Valarie D. Walker, Midland Funding, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Quiet Title
Jermaine Capel v. City of Norfolk
as 24-1437
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE M. CAPEL
Defendant:
CITY OF NORFOLK, CITY OF CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA EMPLOYMENT COMMISSION and others
Snead v. Covington City VA
as 7:2024cv00318
Plaintiff:
King Cedric Omar Snead
Defendant:
Covington City VA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hovis v. Wilson et al
as 1:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Oreon Tyshon Hovis
Defendant:
Wayne Wilson, FNU Moore, County of Rutherford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
