Cases 61 - 70 of 3,623
Hasson et al v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01580
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Hasson and Chad Graddy
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC and AT&T, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00916
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nichols v. AT&T Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00802
Plaintiff:
Timothy Nichols
Defendant:
AT&T Inc. and AT&T Mobility, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Lettieri v. T-Mobile US, Inc., et al.
as 24-3088
Plaintiff:
DAVID CARMINE LETTIERI
Defendant:
T-MOBILE US, INC., SUSAN JOHNSON, PAUL E. BUNANNO and others
Silvan v. AT&T Services, et al
as 2:2024cv01229
Not Yet Classified:
Sara Silvan and AT&T Mobility Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Telsync Technologies LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 6:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Telsync Technologies LLC
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
