Cases 11 - 20 of 145
Regions Bank v. Victory Pipeline, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00503
Plaintiff:
Regions Bank
Defendant:
Florencio Mata, Jr., Victory Pipeline, LLC, Victor P. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Origin Bank v. Smith et al
as 2:2020cv00139
Defendant:
Boots Smith Pipeline Services, LLC, Jason W. Smith, Sandersville Property Holdings, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Origin Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Origin Bank v. Coghlan
as 3:2020cv00477
Plaintiff:
Origin Bank
Defendant:
Kenneth H. Coghlan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dykon Explosive Demolition Corp. v. Northstar Demolition and Remediation, L.P.
as 2:2020cv00070
Plaintiff:
Dykon Explosive Demolition Corp.
Defendant:
Northstar Demolition and Remediation, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Logan v. Yalobusha County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2020cv00050
Plaintiff:
Davidtron Logan
Defendant:
City of Water Valley, Mississippi, Yalobusha County, Mississippi, Deputies/Officers and Jail Employees John Does 1-6 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Regions Bank v. Golden Triangle Urology PLLC et al
as 1:2019cv00199
Plaintiff:
Regions Bank
Defendant:
Golden Triangle Urology PLLC and Kevin Henderson Bond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Regions Bank v. Landrum
as 3:2019cv00635
Plaintiff:
Regions Bank
Defendant:
Thomas David Landrum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Home Bank, N.A. v. George Tarver Operating Co., LLC et al
as 5:2019cv00028
Defendant:
George Tarver Operating Co., LLC and John D. Tarver
Plaintiff:
Home Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holmes v. Day
as 2:2019cv00038
Plaintiff:
Paul H. Holmes and Bud
Defendant:
Dennis Day
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BankUnited, N.A. v. D & D Environmental, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00341
Defendant:
Marcus B. Daniels, D & D Environmental, Inc., Maxx Holdings, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
BankUnited, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
