Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Welsh v. Fennel et al
as 5:2024cv00202
Defendant:
Candy Weaver, FNU Guzman, Chapo Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mosley v. Jennings et al
as 5:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Walter Mosley
Defendant:
Debra Jennings, Christi Greenwalt, John Clum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Francis v. LNU
as 3:2023cv00740
Plaintiff:
John Francis
Defendant:
FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welsh v. McLane, et al
as 5:2023cv00053
Petitioner:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Respondent:
Marsha McLane, Chris Greenwalt, Michael Searchy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Welsh v. McLane et al
as 1:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Defendant:
Marsha McLane, Chris Greenwalt, Michael Searchy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Layton v. McLane
as 22-11144
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bryan Joseph Layton, also known as Mary Kathleen Layton, also known as Katie
Defendant / Appellee:
Marsha McLane, Director of the Texas Commitment Center, John Cochran, Wayne Schmoker and others
Welsh v. Williams et al
as 5:2022cv00183
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Defendant:
Brian Williams, Texas Civil Commitment Center, Julian Chavez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. Cochran et al
as 5:2020cv00185
Plaintiff:
Delbert Glen Rogers
Defendant:
Marsha Mclane - TCCO Executive Director, Aniasa Orneles, FNU Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Welsh v. Correct Care Recovery Solutions et al
as 5:2018cv00020
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Defendant:
Correct Care Recovery Solutions, Bryan Thomas, Chris Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Beasley et al
as 4:2014cv00146
Plaintiff:
Antwain Moore
Defendant:
John Beasley , Charles Jones and Coahoma County, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
