Cases 31 - 40 of 3,623
Joseph v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 6:2024cv01051
Plaintiff:
Josue Joseph
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
USTA Technology, LLC v. AT&T Inc., et al.
as 4:2024cv00513
Plaintiff:
USTA Technology, LLC
Defendant:
AT&T Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Mobility LLC II and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Magic Reimbursements LLC v. T Mobile USA Inc
as 24-2051
Plaintiff:
MAGIC REIMBURSEMENTS LLC
Defendant:
T MOBILE USA INC
BRUCE v. T-MOBILE USA INC.
as 2:2024cv05721
Petitioner:
NELSON L. BRUCE
Respondent:
T-MOBILE USA INC.
Interested Party:
REV FEDERAL CREDIT UNION and TRANS UNION, LLC.
Emmanuel Agbara v. AT&T Mobility LLC
as 24-7046
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Agbara
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC, Evelyn Onyenyi Okoji, Nigerian Catholic Community at St. Jerome Catholic Church and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00959
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Bloosurf, LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01047
Plaintiff:
Bloosurf, LLC
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc. and TDI Acquisition Sub, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Gwendolyn Hall et al v. Department of the Treasury et al
as 2:2024cv03736
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Hall and Rashad K. Shabazz, Jr.
Defendant:
Department of the Treasury, Social Security Administration, Apple Store and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Phillips et al v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al
as 9:2024cv80700
Plaintiff:
Elroy Phillips and Sixtoria Phillips
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC and AT&T, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00579
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
