Cases 31 - 40 of 148
Tate et al v. Zaleski et al
as 3:2019cv00003
Plaintiff:
Darshaun Young, Dena Myers, Angela Tate and others
Defendant:
Total Foot Care, Hattiesburg Total Foot Care, Company John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hammond v. Burns et al
as 3:2018cv00803
Defendant:
Anthony Burns, Robert Myer, New Roads, Louisiana and others
Plaintiff:
Carmen Hammond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01981
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Myers v. Hutchins et al
as 3:2018cv00758
Plaintiff:
George Myers
Defendant:
Matthew Hutchins and City of Forney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv17121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terrebonne Parish Branch NAACP, et al v. Piyush Jindal, et al
as 17-30756
Plaintiff - Appellee:
VINCENT FUSILIER, SR., Reverend, LIONEL MYERS, WENDELL DESMOND SHELBY, JR. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN BEL EDWARDS, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA and JEFF LANDRY, Attorney General, State of Louisiana
Residents Against Flooding, et al v. Reinvestment Zone, et al
as 17-20373
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RESIDENTS AGAINST FLOODING, ANITA GIEZENTANNER, VIRGINIA GREGORY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
REINVESTMENT ZONE NUMBER SEVENTEEN, CITY OF HOUSTON, TEXAS, MEMORIAL CITY REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, also known as TIRZ 17 Redevelopment Authority and CITY OF HOUSTON, TEXAS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Myers v. Lamar County, MS et al
as 2:2016cv00198
Plaintiff:
Stephanie L. Myers
Defendant:
Lamar County, MS, QCHC, Inc., Jason McNelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
