Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Kendricks v. USA Department of Justice et al
as 6:2023cv00701
Plaintiff:
Sheila Denise Kendricks
Defendant:
USA Department of Justice, State of Texas A.G.'s Office, Methodist Children's Home and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hall v. McKinney Independent School District et al
as 4:2023cv00607
Plaintiff:
Samuel Hall
Defendant:
McKinney Independent School District, Farrel Ritchie, Robert Montgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv04376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Gonzales et al v. Dankel et al
as 4:2022cv00416
Plaintiff:
Andrea Collard Gonzales, Kevin Whitt, Dymphna Ferrel and others
Defendant:
Amy Dankel, Cherrie Silas, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00464
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Angela Moody v. Lowndes County, Mississippi
as 16-60684
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANGELA DAWN MOODY
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT FARRELL, in his Individual Capacity
Moody v. Lowndes County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2014cv00197
Plaintiff:
Angela Dawn Moody
Defendant:
Lowndes County, Mississippi, Tony Cooper and Scott Farrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Farrell v. Landrieu et al
as 2:2014cv00772
Plaintiff:
Hervey Farrell
Defendant:
Mitchell J. Landrieu , Ronal W Serpas , Alfred Moran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall Reedom, Jr. v. Louis Ackal, et al
as 13-30764
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARSHALL REEDOM, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUIS ACKAL and FARRELL BONIN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
