Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 3,611
Favre v. Harrison County, MS
as 24-60114
Plaintiff: Noah Don Favre
Defendant: Harrison County, Mississippi, Troy Peterson, Sheriff, MBN Agents, ABC to be named and others
Lowe v. Mills
as 24-60112
Petitioner: John B. Lowe
Respondent: Andrew Mills
Merrill v. Lugo et al
as 4:2024cv00202
Plaintiff: Kilo Moran Merrill
Defendant: Judge Julie Lugo, Court Reporter Karen B. Martinez, Baliff Paul Brinkley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. Contreras et al
as 7:2024cv00028
Plaintiff: Michael Paul Contreras
Defendant: Director, TDCJ-CID, Brandon D. Dishman, Bryan D. Reitsma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Francois v. State of Mississippi et al
as 1:2024cv00063
Plaintiff: Josemany Jean Francois
Defendant: State of Mississippi and Unknown B. Zeringue
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Ward et al
as 7:2024cv00027
Defendant: Heather W. Pederson, Ingrid Y. Ward, Gregory S. Hicks and others
Plaintiff: James E Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Department of Health
as 3:2024cv00178
Plaintiff: Paul C. Jones
Defendant: Department of Health, Eastern Louisiana Mental Health Systems, Turn Key Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bangmon v. Tucker
as 24-40122
Plaintiff: Jerry Lenez Bangmon
Defendant: Calvin Tucker, senior warden, Christopher L. Norsworthy, Assistant warden, Michael B. Crow, Assistant Warden and others
Bolden v. F B O P
as 1:2024cv00270
Plaintiff: Jer'Marise Bolden
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Prisons and F B O P
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Normand v. T. Weber B.
as 4:2024cv00631
Plaintiff: Mark Eric Normand
Defendant: T. Weber B.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?