Cases 21 - 30 of 405
Watson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2022cv00321
Petitioner:
Christopher M. Watson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Womack et al v. Murray
as 5:2022cv00090
Plaintiff:
Shanita Denise Womack and Nikita Goffney, SR
Defendant:
Owen J Murray, David J Baker, Linda K Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bush v. Watson
as 22-40418
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Yusuf O. Bush
Defendant / Appellee:
T. J. Watson, Unit Personnel Hansen, Lieutenant, Unit Personnel Maze and others
Harris v. Watson
as 22-50579
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Reginald Harris
Defendant / Appellee:
FNU Watson, Hillsboro Police Officer, Vernon Busby, Hill County Sheriff Deputy and Officer Rogers
Lewis v. Hooper
as 3:2022cv00413
Plaintiff:
Nathan Lewis
Defendant:
Timothy Hooper, Eric Hinyard, Francis Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ravey v. Collier et al
as 7:2022cv00056
Plaintiff:
Lane B. Ravey
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Carl H. Schiwarts, Caleb S. Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grant v. Watson et al
as 6:2022cv00207
Plaintiff:
Rondrick Grant
Defendant:
Unknown Watson and Unknown Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Hawkins et al
as 3:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
James C Bell
Defendant:
Unknown Hawkin, Randy Lavespere, Kelley Hawkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Forrest County ADC
as 2:2022cv00023
Plaintiff:
Sidney Dewayne Watson
Defendant:
Forrest County ADC
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lytle v. Watson
as 22-50073
Petitioner / Appellant:
Aaron Lytle, Sr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Sheriff Rodney B. Watson, Hill County, Texas and Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
