Cases 31 - 40 of 3,624
Rivens-Baker v. Riley
as 24-50181
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Rivens-Baker, Jr.
Defendant:
Jessica Riley, Roger Boyd, Miriam Herrera, Captain and others
Zarate v. Coger et al
as 5:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
Isaac Zarate
Defendant:
Warden FNU Coger, Warden FNU Gould, Warden FNU Feazel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Wingfield
as 3:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Freddie Lee Curry
Defendant:
B. Wingfield, Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Attorney General
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Favre v. Harrison County, MS
as 24-60114
Plaintiff:
Noah Don Favre
Defendant:
Harrison County, Mississippi, Troy Peterson, Sheriff, MBN Agents, ABC to be named and others
Merrill v. Lugo et al
as 4:2024cv00202
Plaintiff:
Kilo Moran Merrill
Defendant:
Judge Julie Lugo, Court Reporter Karen B. Martinez, Baliff Paul Brinkley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Francois v. State of Mississippi et al
as 1:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Josemany Jean Francois
Defendant:
State of Mississippi and Unknown B. Zeringue
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. Contreras et al
as 7:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Michael Paul Contreras
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID, Brandon D. Dishman, Bryan D. Reitsma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanders v. Ward et al
as 7:2024cv00027
Defendant:
Heather W. Pederson, Ingrid Y. Ward, Gregory S. Hicks and others
Plaintiff:
James E Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Department of Health
as 3:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Paul C. Jones
Defendant:
Department of Health, Eastern Louisiana Mental Health Systems, Turn Key Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
