Cases 31 - 40 of 149
Ealy v. Mitchell, et al
as 6:2019cv00485
Defendant:
DeBorah Oakes Evans and Justin Willoughby
Plaintiff:
Patrick D. Ealy
Consolidated Defendant:
Mark Cargill, Allyson Mitchell, Janice Staples and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ealy v. Mitchell et al
as 2:2019cv00329
Respondent:
Mark Cargill, DeBorah Oakes Evans, Janice Staples and others
Petitioner:
Patrick D. Ealy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lindsey v. Pruitt et al
as 1:2019cv00277
Defendant:
Tommy Gage, Phil Grant, Philip Teissier and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Lindsey, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Culbert v. Bryant et al
as 3:2019cv00419
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Culbert
Defendant:
Phil Bryant and Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ealy v. Evans et al
as 6:2019cv00288
Defendant:
Allyson Mitchell, DeBorah Oakes Evans, Mark Cargill and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick D. Ealy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
KENNEDY v. BRYANT et al
as 4:2019cv00072
Defendant:
Phil Bryant, Haley Barbour and Roger Wruck
Plaintiff:
Solomon S. Kennedy and Soloman S. Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Ingram v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv00299
Defendant:
Superintendent Joe Errington, Lieutenant Rita Bonner, Commissioner Pelicia E. Hall and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ray Ingram
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schofield v. Beckham et al
as 3:2019cv00234
Defendant:
John Toffton and Phil Beckham
Plaintiff:
Morris Demond Schofield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
West v. Bryant et al
as 4:2019cv00021
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Mississippi and Phil Bryant
Petitioner:
Tracy Lee West
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adams v. State of Mississippi et al
as 1:2018cv00216
Defendant:
Govenor Phil Bryant and State of Mississippi
Plaintiff:
David Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
