Cases 41 - 50 of 935
Bell v. Lumpkin
as 1:2023cv00556
Petitioner:
Orlando Bell
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bell v. Collier
as 23-20225
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Darryl Bell
Defendant / Appellee:
Bryan Collier, Executive Director, John Doe, TDCJ Director, Jerry Sanchez, Regional Director and others
Boyd v. Sutton
as 23-60256
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dean C. Boyd
Defendant / Appellee:
Sylvia Sutton, Misty Hughes, Case Manager, Captain Campbell and others
Bell v. Cozby et al
as 1:2023cv00074
Plaintiff:
Rashad Bell
Defendant:
Jennifer Cozby, Jazmine Starkey and Myisha Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Texas Dept. of Crim. Justice
as 4:2023cv01259
Plaintiff:
Marcus Bell
Defendant:
Texas Dept. of Crim. Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Orlando v. Parker et al
as 4:2023cv00285
Plaintiff:
Jon R. Orlando
Defendant:
Robert nmi Parker, A. Hetler, B. Pickett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jordan v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Jordan
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Vital Core, Burl Cain and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shell v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2023cv00857
Plaintiff:
Robert Noble Shell
Defendant:
Ed Gonzalez, Teiva Bell, Harris County Public Defenders Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Bickham
as 5:2023cv00300
Plaintiff:
Christopher M Bell
Defendant:
E Dustin Bickham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bell v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
Joel Bell
Defendant:
Bryan Dobbs, J Bartlett, FNU Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
