Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Eldridge v. Monroe
as 2:2012cv00028
Plaintiff:
Leroy Eldridge
Defendant:
C. Monroe
Amicu:
TDCJ - Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Jones et al
as 1:2011cv00812
Plaintiff:
George Albert Jackson
Defendant:
Victor E Jones, Dean Dove, Calvin K McFerrin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David v. Johnson et al
as 6:2010cv00313
Defendant:
Susan Bauer, B. (Bobcat) Eldridge, T. C. Hendrix and others
Plaintiff:
Michael David
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Texarkana Texas Police Dept et al
as 5:2010cv00177
Plaintiff:
Eldridge Harris
Defendant:
Texarkana Texas Police Department, Unknown Woolridge, Unknown Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDade v. Massie et al
as 4:2009cv00156
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony McDade
Defendant:
Roy Massie, John Ford, III, Brian Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eldridge v. Quarterman
as 08-10687
Petitioner - Appellant:
GEORGE ELDRIDGE
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Eldridge v. Quarterman
as 08-70012
Petitioner - Appellant:
GERALD CORNELIUS ELDRIDGE
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Boyd v. MDOC
as 2:2008cv00044
Plaintiff:
James Eldridge Boyd
Defendant:
MDOC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Eldridge v. Dallas County Jail Detention Center
as 3:2008cv00286
Plaintiff:
Ulyesses Eldridge
Defendant:
Dallas County Jail Detention Center and Dallas County Jail Commander
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Eldridge v. Dallas County Sheriff
as 3:2008cv00195
Petitioner:
Ulyesses Eldridge
Respondent:
Dallas County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
