Cases 61 - 70 of 8,927
Williams v. Doe
as 7:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Jay Williams
Defendant:
John Doe 7:24-cv-108
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rubio v. Lumpkin
as 24-70004
Petitioner:
John Allen Rubio
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Siggers v. Cain et al
as 3:2024cv00443
Defendant:
Chaplin Director Christopher Callicoatte, Commissioner Burl Cain and Superintendent John Hunt
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Reno Fenelli Siggers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. John Doe 7:24-cv-107-O
as 7:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Jay Williams
Defendant:
John Doe 7:24-cv-107-O
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boswell v. Huntsville TX Parole Board et al
as 1:2024cv00852
Defendant:
Huntsville TX Parole Board, Alfredo Salcido, Michael Adams and others
Plaintiff:
John A. Boswell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graydon v. Eastern Louisiana Mental Health System
as 3:2024cv00618
Plaintiff:
John Graydon
Defendant:
Eastern Louisiana Mental Health System
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pelko v. Vargas et al
as 2:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
John Douglas Pelko
Defendant:
Sherriff of Nueces County Jail, Sgt. Perez, Correctional Officer Vargas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCall v. LSP Investigation Service et al
as 3:2024cv00598
Defendant:
John Doe, Shirley Coody, LSP Investigation Service and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Wayne McCall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Tidwell
as 5:2024cv00103
Defendant:
Judge John Tidwell
Plaintiff:
Marquis Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Collier et al
as 4:2024cv02828
Defendant:
Assistant Director Dickerson, Warden Chavelier, Dr. Martha Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
John Eldridge Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
