Cases 61 - 70 of 1,609
Jarvis v. Vergara
as 23-60170
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Thaddeus L. Jarvis
Defendant / Appellee:
Raphael Vergara, Warden, Unknown Wilkinson, Warden, Unknown Kessler, Warden and others
Cortez, Jr. v. Skyview Unit et al
as 9:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
Stephen Cortez, Jr.
Defendant:
Skyview Unit and Gib Lewis Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welsh v. McLane, et al
as 5:2023cv00053
Petitioner:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Respondent:
Marsha McLane, Chris Greenwalt, Michael Searchy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. N P D C et al
as 1:2023cv00347
Plaintiff:
Burchie Lewis, III
Defendant:
Natchitoches Parish Detention Center, Sheriffs Office Natchitoches Parish, Ms Clark-McOneal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Villalobos
as 6:2023cv00129
Petitioner:
Darryl Wayne Lewis
Respondent:
Warden Moises Villalobos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bey v. Stearns
as 1:2023cv00036
Petitioner:
David Lewis Bey
Respondent:
C Stearns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Shariff v. Cain
as 1:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
Abdul Al-Mumit Asad Shariff and Christopher Thomas Lewis
Defendant:
Burl Cain
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garrett v. Smith Unit
as 5:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis Garrett
Defendant:
Smith Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Bickham
as 23-30086
Petitioner / Appellant:
Lerone Lewis
Respondent / Appellee:
Edward Bickham, Warden, Dixon Correctional Institute
Johnson v. Assumption Parish Detention Center et al
as 2:2023cv00504
Plaintiff:
Kovandus Dee Johnson, Sr and Kovadus Dee Johnson, Sr
Defendant:
Assumption Parish Detention Center, Assumption Parish Courthouse, Parish of Assumption and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
