Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 859
Fields v. Neal
as 5:2024cv00070
Plaintiff: Derrick D. Fields
Defendant: Jeff Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. State of Mississippi
as 1:2024cv00131
Plaintiff: Derrick Nelson
Defendant: State of Mississippi
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Collins v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00095
Plaintiff: Derrick Deshon Collins
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Sumrall v. Sollie
as 3:2024cv00190
Plaintiff: Derrick Sumrall
Defendant: Billie Sollie
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cage v. Matthew
as 3:2024cv00232
Plaintiff: Derrick Cage
Defendant: Kerry Matthew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00996
Petitioner: Derrick Lewis
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00207
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Favors v. Tarrant County Correctional Center
as 4:2024cv00155
Plaintiff: Derrick Tenial Favors
Defendant: Tarrant County Correctional Center, Tarrant County Jail Medical Staff and Tarrant County Sherriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. USA
as 4:2024cv00015
Petitioner: Derrick Jones
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Stokes v. Jackson
as 3:2023cv03169
Plaintiff: Derrick Stokes
Defendant: Warden Donald Jackson
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?