Cases 91 - 100 of 207
Scott v. Management & Training Corporation et al
as 5:2018cv00094
Defendant:
Officer Laura Jackson, Latonya Fleming, Management & Training Corporation and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Janicholas Vankeith Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mauk v. Management & Training Corporation et al
as 5:2018cv00068
Plaintiff:
Sara Mauk
Defendant:
Management & Training Corporation and John and Jane Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodgers v. Management & Training Corporation
as 5:2018cv00082
Plaintiff:
Meshea Rodgers
Defendant:
Management & Training Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. Tyson et al
as 6:2018cv00266
Plaintiff:
Kephren Thomas
Defendant:
nfn Tyson, nfn Rupert, NFN Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Tyson et al
as 3:2018cv01369
Plaintiff:
Kephren Thomas
Defendant:
nfn Tyson, nfn Rupert, NFN Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roscoe v. Bradley et al
as 5:2018cv00059
Plaintiff:
Denaricus Antone Roscoe
Defendant:
Jody Bradley, Gabriel Walker and Management Training Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunn v. Management & Training Corporation et al
as 5:2018cv00046
Plaintiff:
Jason Dunn
Defendant:
Management & Training Corporation and John and Jane Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Management Training Corporation et al
as 5:2018cv00044
Plaintiff:
Janicholas Vankeith Scott
Defendant:
Management Training Corporation, Unknown Jackson, Unknown Fleming and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bridget v. Green et al
as 5:2018cv00029
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Roland Bridget
Defendant:
J. Green, Latoya Burden, Robin Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Hale v. Roland Abangan, et al
as 18-60183
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN ASHLEY HALE
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. ROLAND ABANGAN, Official and Individual Capacity, DR. JOHN DOE, Official and Individual Capacity, JOHN AND JANE DOES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
