Cases 151 - 160 of 263
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv02703
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Doe v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2014cv00840
Defendant:
Eduardo Carmona, Corrections Corporation of America and Officer John Roe
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Huber et al v. Gutterman et al
as 1:2014cv00281
Plaintiff:
Frederick Huber and Jennifer Huber
Defendant:
Gerald Gutterman, Brett Immel, Preston Despenas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. Rankin County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2014cv00419
Plaintiff:
Sandra Thomas
Defendant:
Rankin County, Mississippi, Bryan Bailey, Jared K. Morrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Roe et al v. Wade et al
as 4:2014cv00356
Plaintiff:
Deborah Roe, Philadelphia Daily News and David Rothrock
Defendant:
Dwayne Wade, NBA, Vanessa Stiviano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Figueroa-Barajas v. Lund et al
as 2:2014cv01051
Defendant:
George H. Lund, III, John Doe and John Roe
Plaintiff:
Fernando Figueroa-Barajas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Roe v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
as 1:2014cv00258
Plaintiff:
Alishe Roe
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Krohn v. Stipp et al
as 3:2014mc00062
Movant:
James L. Moore
Plaintiff:
Shelley D Krohn
Defendant:
Mitchell D Stipp, MSJM Advisors LLC, Stipp Investments LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
AutoOpt Networks Inc v. GTL USA Inc et al
as 3:2014cv01252
Plaintiff:
AutoOpt Networks, Inc.
Defendant:
GTL USA, Inc. , GTL International LTD. , GTL LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Nicholas Roe v. Rodney Chandler
as 14-10234
Petitioner - Appellant:
NICHOLAS LEE ROE
Respondent - Appellee:
RODNEY W. CHANDLER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
