Cases 161 - 170 of 277
McMeans v. McCool et al
as 2:2014cv00923
Plaintiff:
Bruce McMeans
Defendant:
W T McCool and Harrison County, Jail Division
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Harrison County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2014cv00286
Plaintiff:
Kirsten Davis
Defendant:
Harrison County, Mississippi and John McAdams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Brooks v. Harrison County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2014cv00287
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Brooks
Defendant:
Harrison County, Mississippi and John McAdams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Harrison County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2014cv00288
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Cook
Defendant:
Harrison County, Mississippi and John McAdams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Donald Moran v. Reddix, et al
as 14-60497
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD EUGENE MORAN
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. REDDIX, of Health Assurance and MARCUS THORN, of Harrison County Detention Center
Sumrall v. Corso et al
as 1:2014cv00221
Plaintiff:
Dashawn L. Sumrall
Defendant:
Frederick Corso, Joseph Tuten, Melvin Brisolara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Housley et al v. Harrison County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2014cv00205
Plaintiff:
Christopher Housley and Alonzo Reaves
Defendant:
Harrison County, Mississippi, Harrison County Board of Supervisors, Melvin Brisolara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison County Utility Authority v. Phillips & Jordan, Inc.
as 1:2014cv00171
Plaintiff:
Harrison County Utility Authority
Defendant:
Phillips & Jordan, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Presley v. Brissolara et al
as 1:2014cv00130
Plaintiff:
Larry Dean Presley
Defendant:
Melvin T. Brissolara, David Sanderson, Elaine Lege and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benjamin v. Harrison County et al
as 1:2014cv00115
Plaintiff:
Terence B. Benjamin, Sr.
Defendant:
Harrison County and State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
