Cases 11 - 20 of 126
Reilly v. Louder With Crowder LLC
as 3:2020cv00395
Defendant:
Louder With Crowder, LLC
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Rondinelli Reilly
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Crowder v. The Swatch Group (US) Inc
as 3:2020cv00314
Plaintiff:
Cory Crowder
Defendant:
The Swatch Group (US) Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Bill Jones, et al v. N.O. Regn Physn Hosp Orgn, Inc
as 19-31027
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IVETTE M. PEREZ, BILL JONES, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, GINA AUSTIN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
NEW ORLEANS REGIONAL PHYSICIAN HOSPITAL ORGANIZATION, INCORPORATED, doing business as Peoples Health Network
Aldridge et al v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv00868
Plaintiff:
James Cole, Daphne Tyler, Laverne Boone and others
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Jacqueline Thompson, Pelicia Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Buck Crowder v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 19-20622
Petitioner / Appellant:
BUCK RICHARD CROWDER
Respondent / Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Matthes v. Crowder et al
as 3:2019cv00624
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Unknown Crowder and Unknown Officers
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Alan Matthes
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Munoz et al v. Crowder
as 2:2019cv12246
Defendant:
Rosemary Crowder
Plaintiff:
Allesondra Munoz and Emmanuel Munoz
Cause Of Action: 50 U.S.C. § 0540
Incorrectly Filed
as 3:2019cv00217
Petitioner:
Joe Earl Crowder
Respondent:
Lori Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Crowder v. Davis
as 4:2019cv02343
Petitioner:
Joe Earl Crowder
Respondent:
Lori Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Crowder v. Davis
as 4:2019cv02353
Petitioner:
Joe Earl Crowder
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
