Cases 11 - 20 of 91
Jones v. EEOC
as 21-10914
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Woodrow J. Jones, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, In Their Official Capacity, Belinda McCallister, District Director Official Capacity, Elizabath Roaslez, Official Capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01953
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. Rockhold
as 21-60538
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Arthur J. Jones, Jr.
Defendant / Appellant:
Detective Sergeant Neal Rockhold, Individually and as the agent of the Defendant, City of Hattiesburg
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 3:2021cv01258
Petitioner:
Kevin J. Jones and Kevin Jones
Respondent:
J Rodriguez, Lorie Davis, R Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Lumpkin
as 4:2021cv01708
Petitioner:
Mr. Kevin J Jones
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. O'Bryant et al
as 4:2021cv01403
Defendant:
Officer R. Coleman, Rocky Moore, J. Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin J. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McLean v. United States of America et al
as 1:2021cv00168
Defendant:
Sonya Cole, Cathy Cutwright, Rodney Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Lenroy McLean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harward et al v. City Of Austin et al
as 1:2021cv00095
Plaintiff:
Michael Gillette, David May, Jo Ann Wiersema and others
Defendant:
Austin Community College and City Of Austin
Petitioner:
Mark Mathias
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv12414
Plaintiff:
Mary J. Jones
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi US Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. Orleans Parish Sheriff Office et al
as 2:2019cv12432
Defendant:
Orleans Parish Sheriff Office, Ronald Serpos, New Orleans Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
