Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Black v. Jordan et al
as 2:2018cv00240
Plaintiff:
Valerie Black
Defendant:
Michael Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin et al v. Baker et al
as 3:2018cv00541
Defendant:
Darryl Baker, Cal-Ark International, Inc. and Protective Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Amelia Martin and Michael Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Burns v. City of Jackson, Mississippi et al
as 3:2017cv00436
Plaintiff:
Brian Burns, J.D.
Defendant:
City of Jackson, Mississippi, Lee Vance, Tarik Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Martin v. Robert Tanner, Warden
as 17-30224
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL MARTIN
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT C. TANNER, WARDEN, B. B. RAYBURN CORRECTIONAL CENTER
The Mississippi Bar v. Louvier
as 3:2017ad00001
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
Michael Martin Louvier
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Martin v. NES Global LLC et al
as 4:2016cv03621
Plaintiff:
Martin and Michael Martin
Defendant:
NES Global LLC and Technip USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Martin v. McCain et al
as 2:2016cv06888
Plaintiff:
Michael Martin
Defendant:
W.S. McCain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martin et al v. American Zurich Insurance Company
as 3:2016cv00299
Defendant:
American Zurich Insurance Company, Douglas Lee McCoy and Mercer Transportation Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Amelia Martin and Michael Martin
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Martin v. Colvin
as 3:2014cv03119
Plaintiff:
Michael Martin
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Martin v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as 6:2014cv01138
Plaintiff:
Michael Martin
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd, Takeda Pharmaceuticals L L C and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
