Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Jackson v. C. T.
as 4:2021cv00706
Defendant:
C.T.
Plaintiff:
Michael Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vasquez et al v. Deputy Sheriff Loman et al
as 4:2021cv01794
Plaintiff:
Michael Jackson, Marquise T Stewart, Demarcus Busby and others
Defendant:
Deputy Sheriff Loman and Deputy Sheriff A. Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shephard v. St. Paul Fire
as 21-30199
Defendant / Appellee:
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Jackson, Tamisa Jackson, Emily Shephard and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv02325
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Jackson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2020cv00050
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Michael Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
B. v. Columbus Municipal School District et al
as 1:2019cv00025
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, Michael Jackson and Columbus Municipal School District
Plaintiff:
K. B.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shephard et al v. St Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co
as 5:2018cv01603
Defendant:
St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company and St Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co
Plaintiff:
Michael Jackson, Tamisa Jackson, Emily Shephard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv09711
Plaintiff:
David Michael Jackson
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Jackson v. State Of Texas
as 9:2018cv00112
Petitioner:
Michael Jackson
Respondent:
State Of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Espinoza v. Bexar County Adult Detention Center et al
as 5:2018cv00216
Defendant:
Bexar County Adult Detention Center, Congress, Michael Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
John C. Espinoza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
