Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Mohammed Omran v. Nicole Roy, et al
as 17-30415
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOHAMMED AHMED HASSAN OMRAN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STEPHANIE FINLEY, in her personal and official capacity
Mohammed Omran v. Steve Prator, et al
as 17-30380
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOHAMMED AHMED HASSAN OMRAN
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVE PRATOR, ROBERT WYCHE and SERGEANT DINKINS
Mohammed Omran v. Nicole Roy, et al
as 17-30305
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOHAMMED AHMED HASSAN OMRAN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STEPHANIE FINLEY, in her personal and official capacity
Mohammed Omran v. Steve Prator, et al
as 17-30071
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOHAMMED AHMED HASSAN ABDALLAH OMRAN
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVE PRATOR, ROBERT WYCHE, DIRECTOR HICKS and others
Omran v. Wyche et al
as 5:2017cv00064
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Ahmed Hassan Abdallah Omran
Defendant:
Robert Wyche, Steve Prator, Ardise Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mohammed Omran v. Nicole Roy, et al
as 16-30592
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOHAMMED AHMED HASSAN AB OMRAN
Defendant - Appellee:
NICOLE ROY, UNKNOWN DEFENDANT, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Omran v. Roy et al
as 1:2016cv00042
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Ahmed Hassan Abdallah Omran
Defendant:
Nicole Roy , Unknown Defendant and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Omran v. Prator et al
as 5:2014cv02426
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Ahmed Hassan Abdallah Omran
Defendant:
Steve Prator, Robert Wyche, Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv04505
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Mian et al v. Clement et al
as 3:2007cv01753
Plaintiff:
Abdul Mian, Arif Mohammed Ahmed and Farhat Mian
Defendant:
Paul Clement, Michael Chertoff, Eduardo Aguirre and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
