Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00897
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
USA v. Rufus Kariuki
as 19-10080
Defendant / Appellant:
RUFUS KIMANGI KARIUKI, also known as Robert P. Johnson, also known as Mark Edward
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Sorapuru et al v. Denka Performance Elastomer LLC et al
as 2:2018cv07936
Defendant:
E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, Denka Performance Elastomer LLC, DowDuPont, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Eddrain Williams, Ricky P. Johnson, Joseph Noble and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Spillman v. Russell et al
as 3:2018cv00647
Plaintiff:
Steven L Spillman
Defendant:
Jay Russell, P Johnson and Donna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 - Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Abel et al v. Willis of Colorado Inc et al
as 3:2016cv02601
Plaintiff:
Abel, Stanford Kauffman, Bradley J Davis and others
Defendant:
Willis of Colorado Inc, Willis Ltd and WGH Holdings Ltd
Interested Party:
Ralph S Janvey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 - Diversity: Securities Fraud
Johnson v. Gulfport Police Department
as 1:2016cv00139
Plaintiff:
Robert P. Johnson, II
Defendant:
Gulfport Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Cain et al
as 2:2015cv03408
Plaintiff:
Bryan P. Johnson
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Johnson v. J.C. Penney Company, Inc. et al
as 6:2014cv00722
Plaintiff:
Nathan P Johnson
Defendant:
J.C. Penney Company, Inc., Myron E. Ullman, III and Kenneth H. Hannah
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
