Cases 11 - 20 of 684
Hammons v. Tradeline Motorcars et al
as 3:2024cv00661
Plaintiff:
Demetria-Sharel Hammons
Defendant:
Tradeline Motorcars, Strategic Dealer Services and Sterling Credit Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Conley v. Wright et al
as 4:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Sterling Conley
Defendant:
Mary Francis Hurt Conley Wright, BMI Records, et al, Welk Music and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Sterling v. Narcisse et al
as 2:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
Kevin Robert Sterling
Defendant:
Denise Narcisse, Plaquemines Parish Sheriff and Plaquemines Parish Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sterling v. Francis et al
as 2:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Kevin Sterling
Defendant:
Joseph Francis and Chris Lambert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Van Horne v. Dean et al
as 1:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Steve Van Horne
Defendant:
Judge Sparky Dean, Emily Sterling, Randi Hyatt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Investar Bank v. JPMorgan Chase Bank et al
as 4:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Investar Bank
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank and Modlyne Sterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Silverthorne v. Sterling Seismic
as 24-20006
Plaintiff:
Silverthorne Seismic, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Sterling Seismic Services, Limited, doing business as Sterling Seismic & Reservoir Services
Davis v. Reed
as 23-30886
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Troy Davis
Defendant / Appellee:
P. Reed, Capt., Joseph Westbrook, Msgt., Unknown Scott, Sgt. and others
Sterling v. Lumpkin
as 6:2023cv00842
Petitioner:
Johnny Lee Sterling
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Silverthorne v. Sterling Seismic
as 23-90040
Petitioner:
Silverthorne Seismic, L.L.C.
Respondent:
Sterling Seismic Services, Limited, also known as Sterling Seismic & Reservoir Services
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
