Cases 21 - 30 of 406
Murrell et al v. Walgreen, Co., et al
as 1:2023cv00107
Plaintiff:
Fairen Murrell and Amos Murrell
Defendant:
Walgreens, John Does 1-10, Corporations A-Z and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Porter v. Peden et al
as 2:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
Amos Porter, Jr.
Defendant:
John Michael Peden, II, John Doe Entities 1-5 and John Doe Persons 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Selmon v. Vannoy et al
as 5:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Timothy M. Selmon
Defendant:
Warden Unknown Vannoy, Major Unknown Hooker, Captain Unknown Broomer and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickens v. City of Laurel et al
as 2:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
Deontae Pickens
Defendant:
City of Laurel, City of Laurel Police Department, Tommy Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
USA v. Mun
as 23-10004
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Su Y. Amos Mun, also known as Amos Su Young Mun
USA v. Sifuentes
as 22-40825
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Amos Sifuentes
Amos v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv00709
Plaintiff:
Latonia Amos
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Amos v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2022cv00186
Plaintiff:
Richard Darnell Amos
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spikes v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 2:2022cv03599
Plaintiff:
Amos Spikes
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Amos v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv03318
Petitioner:
Richard Darnell Amos
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
