Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 66
Tatum et al v. Slyger et al
as 4:2016cv01697
Plaintiff: Julius Tatum, II, Marlon D Thomas, Waymond Jackson and others
Defendant: Slyger and William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hartt et al v Clevenstine
as 2:2016cv00503
Plaintiff: Wayne. Hartt and Jeffrey D Thomas
Defendant: Rosetta Clevenstine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hartt et al v. Clevenstine
as 2:2016cv00502
Plaintiff: Wayne. Hartt and Jeffrey D Thomas
Defendant: Rosetta Clevenstine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Julius E. Edwards v. D. Thomas et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00083
Plaintiff: Julius E. Edwards
Defendant: D. Thomas and Rocha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2016cv01165
Plaintiff: Linda D. Thomas
Defendant: Janssen Ortho LLC, Bayer HealthCare, LLC, Bayer Healthcare AG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Eagle U S 2 L L C et al
as 2:2015cv00708
Plaintiff: Linda S Smith , Robert W Smith , Shaune' Spencer and others
Defendant: Eagle U S 2 L L C and David L Ardoin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00522
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
Latrina Thomas v. City of Winnfield
as 15-30047
Plaintiff - Appellant: LATRINA D. THOMAS, Tutrix, on behalf of Ka'Dary Da'Shun Thomas
Defendant - Appellee: TASER INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED
Dennis Thomas v. Timothy Keith, Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-30998
Petitioner - Appellant: DENNIS D. THOMAS
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN WINN CORRECTIONAL CENTER, also known as Timothy Keith
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv01144
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?