Cases 21 - 30 of 48
Stewart v. Gutierrez et al
as 3:2015cv00175
Plaintiff:
Eric D. Stewart
Defendant:
Ernest Gutierrez, Ronald Givens, M. Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Estelle TDCJ Unit
as 3:2014cv04450
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D Stewart, Jr
Defendant:
Estelle TDCJ Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eric Stewart v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 14-20700
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC D. STEWART
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, Executive Director of Texas Department of Criminal Justice in his official capacity, THOMAS LEEPER, JUANITA GONZALEZ and others
Stewart v. County of Coahoma County, Mississippi et al
as 4:2014cv00120
Plaintiff:
Marco D. Stewart
Defendant:
County of Coahoma County, Mississippi , City of Clarksdale, Mississippi, John Rybolt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hartley et al v. Freese & Goss, et al
as 3:2014cv00600
Plaintiff:
Mary E. Hartley , Minnie Copeland , Hazel Thigpen and others
Defendant:
Freese & Goss, PLLC , Richard A. Freese , Dennis C. Sweet, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Marshun Stewart
as 13-60585
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARSHUN D. STEWART
Fountain v. Livingston et al
as 6:2013cv00588
Plaintiff:
Freddie Fountain
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, John A Rupert, Larry G Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. Livingston et al
as 4:2013cv01812
Petitioner:
Eric D Stewart
Respondent:
Brad Livingston, Thomas Leeper, Juanita Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Stewart v. USA
as 3:2013cv00103
Petitioner:
Marshun D. Stewart
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
