Cases 21 - 30 of 77
Lowrey v. John Doe I et al
as 1:2018cv00164
Plaintiff:
Roland Lowrey
Defendant:
John Doe I and John Doe II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calton v. Patel et al
as 1:2017cv00239
Plaintiff:
Allen F Calton
Defendant:
Pinkie Patel, Dale Wainwright, FNU Eckersley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jane Doe I, et al v. Juana Marine-Lombard
as 17-30292
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JANE DOE I, JANE DOE II and JANE DOE III
Intervenor - Appellant:
JEFF LANDRY, Attorney General for the State of Louisiana
Defendant - Appellant:
JUANA MARINE-LOMBARD, in her official capacity as Commissioner, Louisiana Office of Alcohol and Tobacco Control
Hill v. McKenzie et al
as 1:2017cv00021
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lynn Hill
Defendant:
Jim McKenzie, David A Vela, Sam Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calton v. Patel et al
as 1:2016cv00429
Plaintiff:
Allen F. Calton
Defendant:
Pinkie Patel, Dale Wainwright, FNU Eckesley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bartee, Jr. v. Harris County et al
as 4:2016cv02944
Defendant:
Harris County , Andrew Rowell, John Doe I and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Bartee, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Perez, Jr. v. Livingston et al
as 4:2016cv00306
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Jane Doe and Jane Doe II
Plaintiff:
Roberto Perez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Easterling v. Doe et al
as 3:2016cv00042
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Easterling
Defendant:
John Doe, I, John Doe, II, John Doe, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryan Park v. Dee Anderson, et al
as 15-11068
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRYAN L. PARK
Defendant - Appellee:
DEE ANDERSON, Sheriff Tarrant County, JOHN DOE, I, Mansfield Corrections Officer and JOHN DOE, II, Mansfield Corrections Officer
Emesowum v. City of Houston et al
as 4:2015cv02822
Plaintiff:
Benedict Emesowum
Defendant:
City of Houston , Charles McClelland, John Doe I and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
