Cases 21 - 30 of 61
Parham et al v. City of Burkburnett et al
as 7:2017cv00036
Plaintiff:
Shelly D Parham and Victor Hines, III
Defendant:
City of Burkburnett and Daniel C Elbaum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Toan Tang v. Troy Niels, et al
as 17-20047
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TOAN T. TANG
Defendant - Appellee:
SHERIFF TROY NIELS, DEPUTY R. DARD, DEPUTY MARQUS and others
Parham-Miles v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv15913
Plaintiff:
Sheila Parham-Miles
Defendant:
Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceutical, Inc., Johnson and Johnson Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tang v. Sheriff: Troy Niels et al
as 4:2016cv02833
Plaintiff:
Toan T. Tang
Defendant:
Sheriff: Troy Niels, Deputy: R. Dard, Deputy: Marqus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. General Motors LLC
as 4:2016cv01903
Plaintiff:
Eddie Brown , Jennie Acosta , Richard Ankrum and others
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Patterson v. Parham et al
as 2:2015cv06210
Defendant:
Unidentified Parties, Hertz Corporation, Lane-Valente Industries, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Alexis Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Romano et al v. City of San Marcos et al
as 1:2015cv00839
Defendant:
City of San Marcos, Lee Harris, Bob Klett and others
Plaintiff:
Edward F. (Rocky) Romano and Charles E Soechting
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Garcia v. Stevens et al
as 2:2015cv00044
Plaintiff:
Daniel Garcia
Defendant:
Albert A Stevens, Jayson L Hendrix, Norris B Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parham v. Nationstar Mortgage L L C et al
as 5:2014cv03376
Plaintiff:
Gena F Parham
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage L L C and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
