Cases 21 - 30 of 539
Johnson v. Trump et al
as 2:2023cv01183
Plaintiff:
Robert W Johnson
Defendant:
Donald J Trump, Facebook, Meta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Johnson v. Trump et al
as 3:2023cv00566
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Facebook, Meta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Minson v. Farmers
as 2:2023cv04517
Plaintiff:
Rudy Minson
Defendant:
Farmers and Farmers Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Castillo v. Worley Group, Inc.
as 4:2023cv03134
Plaintiff:
RUDY CASTILLO
Defendant:
WORLEYPARSONS GROUP, INC. and Worley Group, Inc. formerly doing business as Worleyparsons Group, Inc.
Sanbrano-Mendez v. Garland
as 23-60441
Petitioner:
Rudys Iveth Sanbrano-Mendez
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-20358
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Union Compression & Services LLC et al
as 6:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
Scottsdale Insurance Company
Defendant:
Union Compression & Services LLC, Kristen Lambright and Rudy Reyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Henry v. Flores
as 6:2023cv00233
Petitioner:
Jody Ray Henry
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ and Rudy Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Montez v. Aguirre & Gonzalez et al
as 5:2023cv00448
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rick Montez
Defendant:
Aguirre & Gonzalez, Ramos & Del Cueto, Jeffrey C. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
