Cases 21 - 30 of 128
Dedon v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 3:2020cv00366
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Not Classified By Court:
David M. Langevin and Richard B. North, Jr.
Plaintiff:
John Dedon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Richard Lucas
as 20-60152
Defendant / Appellant:
RICHARD B. LUCAS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Lay v. Louisiana Parole Board Members et al
as 3:2020cv00094
Defendant:
Louisiana Parole Board Members, James LeBlanc and W. Sandy McCain
Plaintiff:
Richard B. Lay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aubrey et al v. The Estate of Ira Tobolowsky et al
as 3:2019cv02792
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Jackie K Wheelington, Michael B Tobolowsky and others
Plaintiff:
Steven B Aubrey and Brian E Vodicka
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Smith v. Farrer et al
as 5:2019cv01345
Defendant:
Thomas L. Parker, Tu M. Pham, Henry J. Bemporad and others
Plaintiff:
Charmane Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stepp v. Sergeant B S Boswell et al
as 4:2019cv03862
Defendant:
Sergeant S A, Sergeant C L #99, Police Officer James Hauke and others
Plaintiff:
Richard B Stepp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holloway v. The United States et al
as 1:2019cv00964
Defendant:
Nicholas "Nick" Rose, The United States, Tracy Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
Quentin D. Holloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. LeBlanc et al
as 2:2019cv12028
Defendant:
Robert C. Tanner, Karla Hillman, James LeBlanc and others
Plaintiff:
Richard B Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lay v. McCain et al
as 2:2019cv09803
Defendant:
S W McCain and Sandy McCain
Plaintiff:
Richard B Lay
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lay v. McVea et al
as 2:2019cv09160
Defendant:
S W McCain, Iris Harmason, James LeBlanc and others
Plaintiff:
Richard B Lay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
