Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Jones v. Janssen Research & Development LLC f/k/a Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development LLC et al
as 2:2019cv04736
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Company, Bayer HealthCare LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tomplait v. Jones et al
as 3:2018cv01652
Defendant:
Pat Smith and Ricky Jones
Plaintiff:
Gregory Tomplait
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomisee v. Jones et al
as 3:2018cv01632
Defendant:
Pat Smith and Ricky Jones
Plaintiff:
Lanie Drinion Thomisee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Scott Shine v. Ricky Jones, et al
as 18-40533
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTT EVERETT SHINE
Defendant - Appellee:
RICKY JONES, Franklin County Sheriff, JOHN DOES, Unknown Agents of the Franklin County Sheriff Department and HEATH HYDE, Surety
Scott Shine, et al v. Ricky Jones, et al
as 18-40156
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTT EVERETT SHINE and JOSEPH HICKS
Defendant - Appellee:
RICKY JONES, Franklin County Sheriff and HEATH ENIX HYDE, Surety
Scott E. Shine v. Ricky Jones Franklin County Sheriff
as 5:2017cv00051
Plaintiff:
Scott Everett Shine
Defendant:
Ricky Jones Franklin County Sheriff and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nowden v. Molder et al
as 3:2017cv00577
Plaintiff:
Billy Steven Nowden
Defendant:
Douglas Molder, Ricky Jones, Lamar County Sixth District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Smith et al
as 3:2015cv00823
Plaintiff:
John Howard Scott
Defendant:
John Smith, Nolan Bass, Edward Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Milton v. Townsend et al
as 1:2014cv00061
Plaintiff:
Roy Milton
Defendant:
Richard Townsend, John Smith, Fred Schoonover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
