Cases 21 - 30 of 275
Spikes v. Wheat
as 22-30327
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Larce Spikes
Defendant / Appellant:
Lesley Wheat, Nurse, Paula Stringer, Nurse, Robin Bowman, Nurse and others
Mark v. Spears
as 22-40104
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael L. Mark
Defendant / Appellee:
Lee Ann Spears, Kevin R. Wheat, Balden O. Polk and others
Wheat v. Martinez et al
as 3:2022cv00437
Plaintiff:
Loyd Brandon Wheat
Defendant:
FNU Martinez, Dallas County Sheriff Jail Commander, Dallas County Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 6:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
Chico Nakia Curry
Defendant:
Director Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID, Laurey Davis, Nicholas W. Hannah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Davis et al
as 6:2021cv00445
Plaintiff:
Lavace Morgan
Defendant:
Lorie Davis, William J Wheat, William Bradley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Davis v. Wheats et al
as 5:2021cv03179
Plaintiff:
**Sanctioned/Barred* Dennis Ray Davis, Jr
Defendant:
Captain Wheats, Major Haden, C/O Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wise v. Collier et al
as 6:2021cv00339
Plaintiff:
Eric Wise
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, William Wheat, Patrick Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kellison v. Wheat et al
as 6:2021cv00312
Plaintiff:
Cory Donn Kellison
Defendant:
William J. Wheat, Raleigh W. Breeden, Kirt D. Stiefer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Contreras v. DSW Restaurant, Inc. d/b/a Double Shoe Men's Club et al
as 3:2021cv00199
Plaintiff:
Zaira Contreras
Defendant:
DSW Restaurant, Inc. d/b/a Double Shoe Men's Club, 3625 Highway 146, Incorporated and Allen Wheat
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
