Cases 21 - 30 of 468
Winston v. Chauhan
as 4:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Tersia Winston Winston
Defendant:
Darshan Rajesh Chauhan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
American Alliance for Equal Rights v. Winston & Strawn LLP
as 4:2023cv04113
Plaintiff:
American Alliance for Equal Rights
Defendant:
Winston & Strawn LLP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Montano-Chiriboga v. Martinez
as 2:2023cv01506
Plaintiff:
Winston Fernando Montano-Chiriboga
Defendant:
Felipe Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davis v. Constable Precinct One et al
as 4:2023cv03632
Plaintiff:
Tomari Atiba Davis
Defendant:
Constable Precinct One, Deputy Marcias and Corp. Winston Thibodeaux
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Craddock v. State of Louisiana
as 3:2023cv01169
Plaintiff:
Winston Jerold Craddock
Defendant:
State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winston v. East Carroll Correctional Center et al
as 3:2023cv01171
Plaintiff:
**Sanctioned/Barred* Johnny Winston
Defendant:
East Carroll Correctional Center, Riverbend Detention Center, D A Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maggio et al v. Cresent Constructions, Inc et al
as 3:2023cv01379
Plaintiff:
David Robert Maggio and Juan Pablo Mendoz
Defendant:
Cresent Constructions, Inc, Acme Electric Company, Winston Electric, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Winston v. Horseshoe Entertainment
as 5:2023cv00818
Plaintiff:
Terrence Winston
Defendant:
Horseshoe Entertainment
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Winston v. Rankin Cty, State of MS
as 23-60309
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Christopher Winston
Defendant / Appellee:
Rankin County, State of Mississippi
Winston v. State of Mississippi
as 23-60302
Petitioner / Appellant:
Christopher T. Winston
Respondent / Appellee:
State of Mississippi, Rankin County
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
