Cases 31 - 40 of 283
Naylor v. Cain
as 22-60274
Petitioner / Appellant:
Charles Edward Naylor
Respondent / Appellee:
Burl Cain, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections
Bonner v. Ochsner
as 4:2022cv00991
Plaintiff:
Charles Bonner and Charles Edward Bonner
Defendant:
Nathan Ochsner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Haynes v. J&S Fast Transportation Corp, et al
as 2:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
Charles Haynes and Charles Edward Haynes
Defendant:
J&S Fast Transportation Corp, Progressive Express Insurance Company, Rafael Speck and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Richmond v. Edwards et al
as 2:2021cv00420
Plaintiff:
Adarryl L. Richmond
Defendant:
Rhonda Charles Edwards and Pop's Leasing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bryant v. USA
as 1:2021cv00131
Petitioner:
Charles Edward Bryant, Jr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. Johnson
as 21-50595
Defendant / Appellant:
Charles Edward Johnson
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Moore v. Tangipahoa Prsh Sch Bd
as 21-30244
Plaintiff / Appellant:
M. C. Moore, as father and next friend to minors Joyce Marie Moore, Jerry Moore, and Thelma Louise Moore and Henry Smith, as father and next friend to minors Bennie Smith, Charles Edward Smith, Shirley Ann Smith, and Earline Smith
Defendant / Appellee:
Tangipahoa Parish School Board, a corporation
Interested Party:
Melissa Stilley, Superintendent, Tangipahoa Parish School System
Charles DotsonIn re: Charles Dotson
as 21-40225
Petitioner:
Caleb Oden, Ryan Roop and In re: Charles Dotson
Respondent:
Charles Edward Collins
Collins v. Roop
as 21-40227
Defendant / Appellant:
Caleb Oden and Ryan Roop
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Charles Edward Collins
Locker v. Social Security
as 1:2021cv00823
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Locker, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
