Cases 31 - 40 of 9,043
Jackson v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 2:2024cv01109
Plaintiff:
Sorrell Joseph Jackson
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Randy Smith, Jose Ham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ackerman et al v. Arkema Inc.
as 4:2024cv01588
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Ackerman, Mary Ackerman, Sylbestre Aburto and others
Defendant:
Arkema Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Robledo v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice
as 6:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Robledo
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. District County District Attorney of Uvalde, Tx. et al
as 2:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Joshua Daniel Mills
Defendant:
District County District Attorney of Uvalde, Tx. and State District Judge of the 38th District County of Uvalde, Tx.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortega v. Fields et al
as 5:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Ortega
Defendant:
Daniel Gilbert Fields and Eric Doe
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
MT. Hawley Insurance Company v. Armas et al
as 4:2024cv01458
Plaintiff:
MT. Hawley Insurance Company
Defendant:
Daniel Armas, Claudia Alonso Lopez and Cesar Luis Escobar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Waller v. Phillips et al
as 4:2024cv01529
Plaintiff:
Sherman Waller
Defendant:
Mary Phillips, Raymond Fidel, Clay Scheitzach and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mosher v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2024cv00080
Petitioner:
Daniel Emmett Mosher
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Shreveport Police Dept et al
as 5:2024cv00529
Plaintiff:
Laverne Taylor
Defendant:
Shreveport Police Dept, Anthony Vesciotti, Terry Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
