Cases 31 - 40 of 4,525
Nelson v. Stanga et al
as 2:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
Howard J Nelson
Defendant:
Gary T Stanga, Kelsey Miller, William R Penton, III and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. Barrett
as 24-10396
Plaintiff:
Bradley B. Miller
Defendant:
Amy Coney Barrett, In Her Official Capacity, Neil Gorsuch, In His Official Capacity, John G. Roberts, In His Official Capacity and others
Miller et al v. RMP Transport Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv01660
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN MILLER and VENUS JOHN
Defendant:
RPM TRANSPORT SERVICES, INC. and PAUL DAVID NAKUNZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Miller v. Kroger
as 24-20182
Plaintiff:
Ryan Edward Miller
Defendant:
Kroger Company and Kroger Texas, L.P.
Booth v. Miller et al
as 4:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Booth
Defendant:
Brantley Miller and Michael Ganatos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00425
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
LaGaite v. Miller et al
as 6:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Luis Santos LaGaite
Defendant:
Senior Warden Gene Miller, Asst. Warden Annette Marquez, Bryan Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01394
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
