Cases 41 - 50 of 355
Incorrectly filed. Open MC 4:22mc00612
as 4:2022cv01094
Plaintiff:
Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
Ruth R. Hughs, Lizzie Pannill Fletcher, Al Green and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Filed in Error
as 4:2022mc01094
Plaintiff:
Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
Ruth R. Hughs, Lizzie Pannill Fletcher, Al Green and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Payne v. San Antonio Police Department et al
as 5:2022cv00318
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jarvis Payne
Defendant:
San Antonio Police Department, Bexar County Sheriffs Office, The State of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haynes v. United States Marshal
as 3:2022cv00146
Plaintiff:
Jarvis K. Haynes
Defendant:
United States Marshal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McDavid v. Collier et al
as 6:2022cv00087
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Dunk McDavid
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, Warden John Rupert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoskins v. Baker
as 4:2022cv00808
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Dewayne Hoskins
Defendant:
Wendy Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Johnson v. James et al
as 3:2022cv00087
Plaintiff:
Ninnie Johnson
Defendant:
Jarvis Kyle James, East Side Jersey Dairy, Inc., Prairie Farms Dairy, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
USA v. Pierre
as 22-30086
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jarvis Pierre
Brown v. McConnell
as 22-30077
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jarvis Brown
Respondent / Appellee:
Chris McConnell
Smith v Robertson Unit Administration et al
as 1:2021cv00220
Plaintiff:
Jason Ray Smith
Defendant:
Robertson Unit Administration, Jennifer S Cozby, Penny K Dickerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
